A CPA Can Show You the Way

Why hire an Accountant now? Because in a difficult economy, an accountant can help you and or your organization prosper. I offer innovative accounting, tax and technology solutions.

Friday 17 October 2014

Deducting medical expenses and real estate taxes paid by someone else

If you read the IRS instructions for filing Schedule A form 1040, you’ll discover that you can only claim a deduction for medical expenses and real estate taxes you paid. In IRS publication 502, it says “You cannot include medical expenses that were paid by insurance companies or other sources.”

However, in a 2010 Tax Court decision, a daughter was allowed to deduct medical expenses and real estate taxes that her mother paid on her behalf. The daughter wasn’t eligible to be claimed as a dependent by her mother. The Tax Court ruled that the payments were to be considered as a gift made directly to the daughter, and then paid by the daughter to the medical service providers and County Treasurer. The facts of the case supported this treatment. For the complete article, including mention of the gift tax exemption and the Tax Court memorandum, visit this web page: 


Thus if someone is willing to pay your expenses in this manner, they're not just helping you meet your obligations. They're helping you save money by causing you to pay less in taxes, too.

Should you then decide to pay that person back, you should call it a gift, just because their payment was treated as a gift – it’s quite okay to exchange gifts. If you pay them their share of the tax savings too, that can be considered non-deductible personal interest. I recommend that if you pay them back, that you pay their medical expenses and or real estate taxes (if they have them), so that they’re able to deduct the payments and reduce their tax just as you did when they paid your expenses.

If, unlike in the example given above, someone who can claim you as a dependent paid your medical expenses or real estate taxes, they, not you, are entitled to the itemized deduction. In the above example, the daughter was entitled to the deduction; had her mother claimed her as a dependent, only the mother would've been entitled to it.

Be sure that transactions like these take place before the end of this year, so that you and your relative or friend can realize tax savings for this year.

Wednesday 15 October 2014

An Embezzlement in McGuireville and How It Could’ve Been Avoided


The crime of embezzlement is a serious one that can harm not just organizations, but also communities. It’s important for an organization to take preventive measures in the form of fiscal safeguards, so that embezzlement has very little chance of occurring.

One such case of embezzlement is the one that was committed by Kala Pearson in McGuireville, AZ, a town in the Beaver Creek district where I lived from 2008 to 2013.

Kala was a resident of McGuireville. On December 20, 2012, she was arrested for the theft of $33,000 from the Beaver Creek Village Property Owners Association (BCVPOA), and charged with extortion. Reportedly, she admitted to the theft.1  Kala had been the organization’s Secretary.

She withdrew money from BCVPOA’s bank account for personal use that had been pledged to pay for the building of a bridge over Beaver Creek. The purpose of the bridge proposal was to enable McGuireville residents to drive across the creek after it flooded. Moreover, she used the organization’s ATM card to purchase food at local markets for her own needs.

The news of Kala’s arrest came as a complete surprise to me, a resident of Rimrock in Beaver Creek, as I’m sure it was for many other Beaver Creek residents.  

I first met Kala in 2009 when I was inducted as a member of the Beaver Creek Kiwanis Club. Kala and her husband Frank were also members. She and Frank owned a bed-and-breakfast in McGuireville.

Kala came across to me as a local activist for community improvement. She was Chairman of the Beaver Creek Regional Council, a local planning organization. She organized the Ranch House Coalition (RHC) which purchased and restored the Ranch House Restaurant and Golf Course, two Beaver Creek landmarks, after the restaurant had fallen into disrepair. The Coalition’s major objective was to help the district’s economy. She helped organize and was President of the Beaver Creek Community Development Corporation (BCCDC), a private non-profit organization formed to develop and manage economic development projects for the sustainability of the Beaver Creek Community. RHC was one of those projects.

She led the effort to build the above-mentioned bridge over Beaver Creek in 2009, the year BCVPOA was incorporated. The road crossing the creek is the easiest means of access for residents wishing to enter and leave McGuireville. BCVPOA raised funds for the bridge construction and had the responsibility for maintaining McGuireville’s roads. A separate fund was established and maintained for that purpose.

What is remarkable about Kala’s story, in my opinion, is that she, as a person of color, has had so much influence over the Beaver Creek, AZ community, which is mostly white. She clearly represents how far the Black race has come in this country since the era of slavery. Yet Kala isn’t just an ordinary black person who has been accepted as an equal by our community. Kala achieved near-celebrity status here in a manner similar to the way Frederick Douglass became a celebrity in England during the mid-1840s, albeit on a smaller scale. Douglass was a former slave who gained his freedom, wrote a best-selling autobiography, and published abolitionist newspapers. Kala, like Frederick Douglass, has the gift of oratory and has used it as a powerful weapon to persuade people to join her causes. Or you could say that she has a talent for monopolizing a discussion and controlling it to her advantage. She has a keen political sense. 
  
From what Kala told me about her bed-and-breakfast, I was under the impression that it was doing well and that she was financially solvent. Thus I couldn’t understand why she stole the money from her own Property Owners Association. I decided to speak with Ellen, the President of BCVPOA and a resident of Rimrock, to learn more about why it happened.

Although we hadn’t met before, Ellen was helpful about providing the information I was seeking. She said that despite the Coalition’s success at raising more than $300,000 to purchase the Ranch House and golf course, it was still short of funds needed to meet expenses. The restoration of the Ranch House was an enormous undertaking. It was a bigger project than Kala and other members of the Coalition anticipated.

Kala and her husband Frank weren’t doing as well financially as I thought. Frank lost his job as a computer technician. Ellen said that she learned that their bed-and-breakfast was struggling when she read that they applied for a zoning permit or variance for it, and their application was denied.

One of the first signs that there was wrongdoing on Kala’s part was when Ellen found out that Kala somehow came up with the money in August 2012 to pay the Restaurant’s payroll and other expenses. It turned out that Kala wrote a check for $20,000 from the BCVPOA and deposited it into the Ranch House Coalition account. Kala wasn’t authorized by the BCVPOA Board of Directors to take that action, according to Tom, BCVPOA’s Treasurer.

Kala was given access to BCVPOA’s bank account, even though she was only the organization’s secretary. I asked Tom about it. Apparently Kala intimidated him into giving her access. He said Kala and his nephew, who lived in McGuireville, had a dispute over a large rock owned by Kala that was partly on his nephew’s property. Tom’s nephew asked Kala to move the rock. She wouldn’t budge, and neither would the rock. Kala then harassed him. Tom knew that she plays hardball, i.e. that she’s vindictive so for his nephew’s sake he relinquished access to the organization’s funds to her. Tom didn’t try to challenge Kala. He didn’t want the hassle.  

Kala then managed to obtain a debit card in the POA’s name from Chase Bank, in which the POA’s funds were deposited, without any authorization from the other BCVPOA Officers or Directors. Chase Bank simply accepted Kala’s authorization as an officer of BCVPOA without question.

Ellen admitted to me that neither she nor the other BCVPOA Officers and Directors thought that Kala would steal from the organization. They were friendly with Kala and Frank, and they knew about Kala’s involvement in activities that strengthened the community. There didn’t appear to be any need to take precautions. Besides, only five checks were paid from the bridge fund since its inception.

Tom admitted, when I asked him about it, that Kala’s being black had something to do with the fact that the BCVPOA Board members trusted her with the organization’s funds.

When I first spoke with Ellen and Tom, they didn’t think that anything could’ve been done to stop Kala from stealing her organization’s funds. But then they agreed with me when I suggested that no one in a position of trust should be allowed unrestricted access to the organization’s financial assets without having safeguards. These precautions could’ve been taken to protect even a small organization like BCVPOA from embezzlement or extortion:

1)    Delegate the responsibility for check writing and cash transaction processing to no more than three people: the President, Vice President and Treasurer. The Treasurer should write the checks and maintain the accounting records. The President and perhaps the Vice President as well, should sign the checks. This approach results in a proper separation of responsibility which increases accountability and reduces the possibility of theft.

In general, a Secretary shouldn’t be given access to the organization’s bank account. The role of a Secretary doesn’t include management of the organization’s financial assets.

2)    Do a background check on individuals in sensitive positions or with considerable responsibility. It should be done not only when they’re considered for a position, but occasionally after they assume responsibility as well. This would alert the organization to financial problems an individual may be having, Kala in this case, that would tempt him or her to take resources from the organization to reduce their financial stress. For example, it might have shed light on Kala’s financial situation to learn about how the organizations she established were doing financially.  BCVPOA could also have found out whether Kala received a salary from BCCDC or RHC.

3)    Arrange to have risk management bonding coverage for individuals who have direct access to financial assets such as cash, ATM cards, and checks. This would reimburse the organization in the event of embezzlement.

4)    Hire an accountant to perform an audit or review of the organization’s financial records. Preferably, the accountant should be a CPA to ensure the highest quality of service.

5)    Make sure that your bank doesn’t allow someone to obtain an ATM card or any other form of access to your bank account without a corporate resolution officially approved of by the Board of Directors. For example, when my community’s POA, Montezuma Estates Property Owners Association, wanted to add a signer to its bank account, our bank, National Bank of Arizona, required that we provide a copy of the minutes from a recent Board of Directors meeting showing that the Board voted to approve the additional signer. If your bank doesn’t have at least a similar policy, take your banking business elsewhere.

6)    Corporate bylaws and LLC Operating agreements typically state the rights and powers of shareholders, directors and officers. As the provisions of these documents are often ignored or forgotten, it may be sensible for a director, officer or member to be given the responsibility for monitoring compliance with them.

7)    Don’t use signature stamps for checks. There’s a potential for misuse, especially if the stamp falls into the wrong hands. It’s safer to sign the checks with a pen instead. Better yet, avoid using checks and make payments online whenever you can. This avoids check-writing fraud, which has become a considerable problem due to the worsened state of the economy.

8)    Establish limits for ATM and credit cards, so that individuals may not spend the organization’s money beyond what is necessary for performance of their duties.

9)    Require that the Board of Directors approve all significant cash expenditures and new check signers.

10) Checks written for more than a certain amount should be countersigned by a Director or Officer. The identity of the counter-signer should be authorized in advance by the Board of Directors or the President.

11) Document all transactions involving significant cash receipts and disbursements, including the authorization of disbursement transactions. For example, a decision to give an officer check-signing authority could appear in Board meeting minutes.

12) Reconcile your bank statement to your checkbook at least monthly. This should be done by the Treasurer or someone independent of those having access to the funds.

13) Financial statements should be prepared and reviewed by the Board of Directors on a regular basis.

14) Have an accounting policies and procedures manual.

15) Have an organization chart that clearly defines the scope of each individual’s responsibilities.

16) Try to obtain the involvement of as many community members as possible. This would increase the amount of attention being paid to the organization’s activities, and discourage a dishonest Officer or staff member from stealing.

Organizations that had adequate safeguards were much less likely to be the victims of theft or fraud. Yet in small communities like Beaver Creek, organizations like POAs have taken few if any precautions. They may not have been aware that they needed to, or they were too trusting of their friends in management positions, or they were uncomfortable about taking such measures. In short, they weren’t business-minded enough.

McGuireville’s loss of $33,000 and the feud described above were just two unfortunate consequences of this crime. Another was the distrust it engendered within the Beaver Creek community: when I attended a Ranch House Coalition meeting in January 2013, I heard very little said about returning the money to its rightful owners.

The rapid manner in which Ellen spoke about what happened with Kala and the BCVPOA was an indication that she may have felt some regret in having to press charges against Kala.

Some people believe that Kala deserves to be excused from punishment due to her contributions to the community’s welfare. See the blog following the Camp Verde Bugle’s article dated December 24, 2012: http://www.cvbugle.com/main.asp?TypeID=1&ArticleID=36934&SectionID=1&SubSectionID=991&Page=1. Should leniency be shown to Kala? I believe that if she committed a crime she should be punished for it, or at least be required to make restitution to BCVPOA. Ellen agreed with me about that.
1     per the article in Sedona.biz 12/31/12